On Mon, 7 May 2012, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > It looks like you're replacing a reset_resume method with a regular > > resume method. Is that really the right thing to do? > > As only 2 usb-serial drivers have ever implemented reset_resume, and > they both did the same exact thing that their resume functions did, I > think it is safe as resume will be called if reset_resume is not set, > right? Actually no. If the device is going through a reset-resume and a driver's reset_resume method pointer isn't set, the driver will be unbound and then later rebound. It's not a matter of just calling the resume method instead. Although maybe for serial devices it doesn't make much difference. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
