On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:08:42PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > >From 66da838935cc4a3aba4275fbea7b5165be04ea12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:04:47 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] USB:optimize usb_unblock_urb > > usb_unblock_urb() is identical to usb_unpoison_urb() > Optimize to an implementation with the preprocessor > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@xxxxxxx> > --- > > This addresses Alan's concern. Ick, no, roll this into your previous patch and never call anything called usb_unblock_urb() at all please. That way we don't have duplicate function names that do the same thing. Please redo this patch, and the HID one and resend it as one. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
