On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > > > Does it make sense now? > > > > No. What happens if dynamic debug is enabled for one line that calls > > dbg_port_buf() but not for another? There's no way to avoid the string > > formatting in both lines, even though one of them discards the result. > > That's why I said in my initial mail: > > Does dynamic debug offer an "is the message two lines below enabled" test? > > What I meant is that dbg_port() could test if it > needs to call dbg_port_buf() for this call site. Oh. As far as I know, that's not possible. > Anyway, maybe the dbg_*_buf() are not called often enough to worry? Probably not. > If you're OK with "#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG)" > then maybe you should just do that? Yes, that sounds best. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
