Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/2] usb: dwc3: core: split host address space

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:19:29PM +0000, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:balbi@xxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 6:08 AM
> > 
> > This will prevent dwc3.ko from ioremapping
> > the entire memory space, thus preventing xHCI
> > from requesting its own part of the address.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c |   26 +++++++---
> >  drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h |  122 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> >  2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > index e7c853a..3c69d1a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > @@ -405,6 +405,7 @@ static void dwc3_core_exit(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> >  static int __devinit dwc3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct device_node	*node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > +	struct resource		host_resource[2];
> >  	struct resource		*res;
> >  	struct dwc3		*dwc;
> >  	struct device		*dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -431,7 +432,24 @@ static int __devinit dwc3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  		return -ENODEV;
> >  	}
> > 
> > -	dwc->res = res;
> > +	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > +	if (irq < 0) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "missing IRQ\n");
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	host_resource[0].start = res->start;
> > +	host_resource[0].end = res->start + 0x7fff;
> > +	host_resource[0].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> > +
> > +	host_resource[1].start = irq;
> > +	host_resource[1].end = irq;
> > +	host_resource[1].flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ;
> > +
> > +	dwc->res = host_resource;
> > +
> > +	/* Skip host address space */
> > +	res->start += 0xc100;
> 
> Maybe it would be a good idea to make the Device address space end
> at 0xcbff? And then add another resource for OTG starting at
> 0xcc00. That would allow the OTG driver to have its own address
> space. Not sure if that's necessary, I'm just thinking out loud
> here.

Maybe... but the otg driver will be linked to this same driver, so will
be needed at all ? I think the only piece which is a separate driver is
xHCI. Ido, what do you think ?

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux