On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 23:36 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 20:41 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > On 04/07/2012 04:55 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > <SNIP> > I really don't have a strong opinion here either way, but it would be > nice for consistency and grok-abilities sake to go ahead and merge it > down into a single source + header file it's current size (~2700 LOC).. > > > >> From there things are ready to start dropping into for-next for a > > > v3.5-rc merge candidate if there are no other objections from the USB > > > folks. 8-) > > > > What happened to the v3.4 merge window? Were you missing ACKs or just > > busy that you were not able to prepare a pull? > > > > I've had my hands full with qla2xxx target mode, and did not have a > chance to get this code into for-next in time for a v3.4-rc1 merge.. > > Given the extra time it makes sense to go ahead and do the re-org now > ahead of dropping into for-next. So please go ahead and send me that > re-org patch against lio-core.git HEAD, and I'll copy over the end > result into a for-next commit for your review. > Hey Sebastian, Could you take care of this in the next couple of days so we can get this ready into this upcoming sunday's linux-next build..? If not, I'm OK with doing the conversion to a single source/header in the next days myself if you're currently busy with other items.. Thanks! --nab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
