> -----Original Message----- > From: Alan Stern [mailto:stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 2012年3月22日 0:28 > To: Nicolas Pitre > Cc: Neil Zhang; Jason Cooper; Arnd Bergmann; Andrew Lunn; Jamie Lentin; USB > list; michael@xxxxxxxx; devicetree-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: EHCI_MV confusion was: Re: kirkwood devicetree respin > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Alan Stern wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Jason Cooper wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:54:53PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > ehci-orion only makes sense on PLAT_ORION, and they never have any > > > > > > other platform ehci driver. > > > > > > > > > > > > ehci-mv only makese sense on PLAT_PXA, and they also don't have any > > > > > > other platform ehci driver. > > > > > > > > > > BTW, as someone who once was the active maintainer for PXA, and later > > > > > the active maintainer for Orion, I should say that ehci-mv is a > terribly > > > > > bad name (as demonstrated, not all Marvell SOCs use ehci-mv) and > > > > > confusion would be much reduced if it was renamed to ehci-pxa. > > > I think there is still value in the rename. "mv" is a really bad > > qualifier for an IP block from a company that has many of them for the > > same purpose. We have submitted a patch to remove ehci-pxa168.c. And we have plan to rename the driver name for ehci-mv.c. Thanks. > > Then you should discuss this with the driver's maintainer (CC'ed). > > Alan Stern Best Regards, Neil Zhang ?韬{.n?????%??檩??w?{.n???{炳???骅w* jg????????G??⒏ ⒎?:+v???????? ????＂??????
