On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:23:31AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Is there any way to reproduce this? > > > > > > It seems to be saying that usb_stor_pre_reset() was called twice > > > without usb_stor_post_reset() being called in between, because the > > > post_reset routine is where the lock gets released. I don't know of > > > any way that could happen. > > > > Looks it is a device with multiple usb mass interfaces, care to > > post the 'lsusb -v' of the device? > > I've just asked the user for this data. > You can follow along at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799598 if you wish. Yes, that is just the case I expected. In the device '12d1:1436', the only configuration includes two mass storage interfaces. Considered Alan has confirmed the patch, I will send out a formal one. thanks, -- Ming Lei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
