On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 02:59:05PM -0800, David Daney wrote: > On 03/09/2012 02:31 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > >It seems that the current trend is to have the USB subsystem > >"know" which arch are ECHI and OHCI, versus having the board > >manually select the values. > > I think the opposite is true, which is why the OCTEON code is in its > current state. What is the "current state"? > Unless Greg KH overrides me, I would have to say NACK. Why? Isn't this the way that other boards work? > > The current defconfig for Cavium > >produces the following: > > > > warning: (MIPS_ALCHEMY&& CAVIUM_OCTEON_REFERENCE_BOARD&& > > SOC_AR71XX&& SOC_AR724X&& SOC_AR913X&& SOC_AR933X) selects > > USB_ARCH_HAS_EHCI which has unmet direct dependencies (USB_SUPPORT) How will you resolve this warning if you NACK this patch? greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
