On Saturday 25 February 2012, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Unfortunately, the way that ohci handles the abstraction between the > > various implementations is backwards, it would be much easier if the > > main driver was following that model to start with. > > ... exactly for that reason I didn't suggest it. Looking at other ohci-sources > (e.g. ohci-omap.c), machine_is_* seems to be the consistent use-case. I still hope that someone takes the time to convert ohci and ehci into something more regular, building the .c files separately instead of the conditional #include "foo.c" inside of the main file. Alan and Greg, do you know if anyone is working on that, and if not do you think someone should do it? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
