On Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:14 AM Benoit Goby wrote: > > > > That's great, but we can't do anything with adb changes here, > right? I > > like the fact that this is much less code, any chance of actually > > getting adb changes accepted into the main Google repos? > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Hi Andrzej, > To contribute your patch to Android, you can follow these instructions: > http://source.android.com/source/submit-patches.html > https://groups.google.com/group/android- > contrib/browse_thread/thread/7398d82735c2306b > You can cc me on the review. Let me know if you need help uploading > your change. > > Thanks, > Benoit @Benoit: Thanks, I will follow these instructions. @Greg KH: You are right; I posted to linux-usb to let you know about the development in this area because I considered it important for the community to know about the development of FunctionFS support in adb @Michal: Not checked thoroughly enough... Thanks for pointing out about idVendor and iSerialNumber in composite.c. Using these parameters with 3.2's g_ffs the adb over FunctionFS works. Andrzej -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
