Re: Mass storage suspend questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Samstag, 14. Januar 2012, 17:39:04 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2012, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> 
> > True. Taking this to the logical conclusion they should have two delays,
> > one for internal events and one for external events.
> 
> Sometimes it's not so easy to make the distinction.  Sure, you can tell
> why the hub woke up originally, but other things may happen while the
> hub is awake.  For example, a hub may get woken up because of an 
> autoresume call for a child, and while it's awake there may be a port 
> connect change.

True, but do we care? Surely the reaction to child nodes is the far
more common case and we are talking about a heuristic anyway.

	Regards
		Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux