On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 09:12:36PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2011-12-16 15:47:24 [+0100]: > > >>If you want to take a stab at redoing your patch #2 to use only one > >>status URB for USB 2.0 devices, I would appreciate it. Then I can build > >>the abort/reset synchronization on top of it. > >Okay. > > Just once things started to become easy.... So while I tried to have > only one status urb which I always re-submit (as Matthew/ You suggested) > I run into the problem that I don't have struct scsi_device yet. So I > just created a device with two luns to see if this struct happens always > to be same. Ofcourse it is not. Can you not send one status URB per LUN (instead of one per command)? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
