Hi Heikki, Any updates for your patch? If possible, I would like to co-work with you about this patch, and test it at my platform. Balbi, I think Heikki's OTG rework patch plus his first RFC to separate otg utilities with phy utilities (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg50149.html) is meaningful, at least for platforms who have no OTG driver, but need phy operation. Just like current mainline Freescale i.mx usb driver, it has not otg driver now, but it really needs phy's operation. BRs, Peter Chen On Nov 9, 2011, at 6:48 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:25:23PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> good to know that there's more coming. Since we're at the very begining >> of the 3.2 cycle, you could take some time and prototype a little more >> of what's coming and how things should look like in the long run. I'll >> leave this series cook for a little longer before applying. I'll also >> wait for updates on the comments I had. > > OK, let's wait with these. I'm not going to introduce more then very > basic support for multiple transceivers if you remember. I'm more > interested in introducing the generic OTG state machine. Is this > acceptable for you? > > We are working with the new ChipIdea driver that is meant to replace > all the existing drivers in Linux kernel for this same controller. I > want to introduce the state machine with that driver. Would it make more > sense to send all of these with the OTG sm support for the new driver? > > -- > heikki > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
