On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:48:33PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:25:23PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > good to know that there's more coming. Since we're at the very begining > > of the 3.2 cycle, you could take some time and prototype a little more > > of what's coming and how things should look like in the long run. I'll > > leave this series cook for a little longer before applying. I'll also > > wait for updates on the comments I had. > > OK, let's wait with these. I'm not going to introduce more then very > basic support for multiple transceivers if you remember. I'm more > interested in introducing the generic OTG state machine. Is this > acceptable for you? > > We are working with the new ChipIdea driver that is meant to replace > all the existing drivers in Linux kernel for this same controller. I > want to introduce the state machine with that driver. Would it make more > sense to send all of these with the OTG sm support for the new driver? could be... but hey, instead of replacing the in-tree drivers, just re-factor that old code. I really don't want to apply 'git rm' patches. Clean what's already merged, please. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
