Hi, On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 05:04:43PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 08:28:15PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote: > > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but sounds like you are still marrying > > > OTG with transceivers. > > I'm against the idea of usb_phy married with the transceiver (i.e > > transceiver = twl6030 for instance) > > I think the source of confusion is the split phy functionality on OMAPs. > twl6030 basically provides VBUS/ID comparators which communicate VBUS/ID > levels to internal PHY via a well-defined mailbox. We need a > good way to write that down in source code. OK, I think I understand now. So this issue is not in the scope of these patches, right? Br, -- heikki -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
