On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:03:36 +0300, Tero Kristo said: > Hi Again, > I created a new version of the patch which should be better than this > hack, I'll send it as an RFC to the l-o list in a bit. > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 13:49 +0200, Munegowda, Keshava wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 09:12 +0200, Munegowda, Keshava wrote: > > >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Munegowda, Keshava > > >> <keshava_mgowda@xxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> wrote: > > >> >> On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 08:04 +0200, Basak, Partha wrote: > > >> >> Texas Instruments Oy, Tekniikantie 12, 02150 Espoo. Y-tunnus: 0115040-6. Kotipaikka: Helsinki > > > Texas Instruments Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki, Finland. Business ID: 0115040-6. Domicile: Helsinki > Texas Instruments Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki, Finland. Business ID: 0115040-6. Domicile: Helsinki Moral: Just leave current street addresses out of it. :) And can we *please* trim irrelevant stuff? You top-posted a 2 line reply, followed by the entire note, which a bunch of kernel developers got to scroll through and wonder if they missed an in-line comment. *Especially* after the top part had one line that it wasn't clear if it was a top-posted sig line gone wrong, or 3 attempts to get an address right for inclusion in a patch.
Attachment:
pgpym_rwfjjVG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
