On 10/13/2011 5:21 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 10/11/2011 06:54 AM, Pavan Kondeti wrote: >>> >> while playing around with gadgetfs and the ci13xxx_udc driver on mx28 >>> >> I found some problems regarding locking and DMA handling. Another problem >>> >> arises when using the ci13xxx_udc driver on mx28, because it has only 8 >>> >> compared to 16 endpoints as the driver expects. >>> >> With these patches g_ether and gadgetfs work on the mx28, however I was >>> >> not able to test these patches on any other hardware. Voluntaries welcome. >> > Thanks for the improvements and bug fixes in ci13xxx_udc driver. All the >> > patches looks good to me. I am slightly busy with other stuff. Will test >> > these patches on MSM platform next week. > We've discovered a problem with the driver (on a mx23). > g_zero test 2 fails. > > Michael (Cc'ed) can provide more information. > > Pavan, if your time permits can you check if g_zero passes all tests on > the MSM platfrom with and without our patches applied? I have run testusb on MSM with and without your patches. The test results are same. I did not see test 2 failing in my testing. But I observed occasional failure of test #9 (Chapter 9 tests). I will debug test#9 failures further... Over all, the patches looks good to me. Tested-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
