On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, Paul Zimmerman wrote: > > From: Paul Zimmerman > > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 1:19 PM > > > > Hi Alan, > > > > Yes, your patch is more correct I think, mine doesn't take care of writing > > the correct amount of data to the backing file. But your patch misses the > > code in throw_away_data() that does the same thing. Do you mind if I fix > > that up, make a similar patch for f_mass_storage.c, and submit it? > > Whoops, I must be blind. Of course your patch does handle throw_away_data() > too. Sorry about that. If you want to make the equivalent changes to f_mass_storage.c and submit a combined patch, that's okay with me. Just give me some credit in the patch description. :-) I tracked down the earlier discussions. See these email threads: http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=130096570404235&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=130164710522223&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=130279510629643&w=2 Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
