Hi, On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:16:07PM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote: > >>>>+obj-$(CONFIG_USB) += common.o > >>>>+obj-$(CONFIG_USB_GADGET) += common.o > > >>>Will this cause problems? For example, what if CONFIG_USB is Y and > >>>CONFIG_USB_GADGET is M? > > >>>Also, it seems a little silly to have an entire kernel module devoted > >>>to a single, little function. > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:06:43 +0200, Alan Stern > <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >You could do: > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT) += common.o > > > >which would build that subroutine into the main kernel whenever either > >side of the USB stack is enabled. > > OK. I'll wait for any more possible comments and post changed version > by the end of the week. if it's only for one single function, wouldn't a static inline in a common header do ? -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
