Re: [PATCH 10/11] wusb: use printk_ratelimited() instead of printk_ratelimit()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello.

Manuel Zerpies wrote:

Since printk_ratelimit() shouldn't be used anymore (see comment in
include/linux/printk.h), replace it with printk_ratelimited()

Signed-off-by: Manuel Zerpies <manuel.f.zerpies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/usb/wusbcore/wa-xfer.c |    7 +++----
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/wusbcore/wa-xfer.c b/drivers/usb/wusbcore/wa-xfer.c
index 6ccd93a..4193345 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/wusbcore/wa-xfer.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/wusbcore/wa-xfer.c
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/hash.h>
+#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
#include "wa-hc.h"
 #include "wusbhc.h"
@@ -1217,16 +1218,14 @@ static int wa_xfer_status_to_errno(u8 status)
 	if (status == 0)
 		return 0;
 	if (status >= ARRAY_SIZE(xlat)) {
-		if (printk_ratelimit())
-			printk(KERN_ERR "%s(): BUG? "
+		printk_ratelimited(KERN_ERR "%s(): BUG? "
 			       "Unknown WA transfer status 0x%02x\n",
 			       __func__, real_status);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	errno = xlat[status];
 	if (unlikely(errno > 0)) {
-		if (printk_ratelimit())
-			printk(KERN_ERR "%s(): BUG? "
+		printk_ratelimited(KERN_ERR "%s(): BUG? "
 			       "Inconsistent WA status: 0x%02x\n",
 			       __func__, real_status);
 		errno = -errno;

   Why not pr_err_ratelimited()?

WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux