Re: Fwd: Question on IP_TOS options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:25:11PM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> (taking it offlist just because I have no idea about anything really)
>
> c'mon, quite good point below ;-)
>
>> >yeah, but if the problem isn't throughput, I don't see how MUSB
>> >could be to blame here. The network priority should have been
>> >handled by IP layer and the controller shouldn't matter, right ?
>>
>> I'm just a silly router guy, but I've seen on router platforms that
>> when the device driver has a big buffer (FIFO) that the IP layer
>> feeds into (which then does some kind of priority scheduling of
>> packets), one loses a lot of QoS capabilities.
>
> MUSB doesn't have any big buffers of its own. In this situation it's
> using the buffers from usbcore. So it should be the same on the ISP1362
> host ;-)
>
> Good point anyway :-D
>
>> So the device driver can indeed cause these kinds of problems, if it
>> doesn't push back the congestion to the IP layer properly. Also if
>> the device FIFO buffer drops packets on its own the same behaviour
>> can be seen.
>
> USB won't drop packets unless you explicitly tell it to flush the HW
> FIFOs. I don't think this is the case here either.
>

Actually I saw this happen because wireless driver called usb_unlink_urb().
i don't know what's ISP1362 did in this situation, but it seems musb
will flush the HW FIFOs.
Maybe this will cause the priority problem ? I am not sure :-).

-- 
Regards,
--Bob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux