On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:49:35PM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote: > On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:00:20 +0200, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >Yes, we should rely on udev for automatically loading the correct > >drivers when the hardware is found. > > > >But, how are we telling userspace that this driver is needed? That > >needs to be in place for modprobe (which is what udev calls) to be able > >to know which module to load. I don't see that change here, but I might > >be missing it. > > I'm under the impression that long standing goal is to make gadget be able > to load without UDC and later attach them to UDC (or even multiple UDCs) > via sysfs or something. That would somehow solve the problem, right? > Or am I misunderstanding the direction those patches are headed? Yes, that the longterm goal ;-) -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
