Am 07.06.2011 16:43, schrieb Greg KH: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:38:12AM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote: >> Am 06.06.2011 17:06, schrieb Greg KH: >>> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:23:16PM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote: >>>> Hi David, >>>> >>>>> From: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:01:41 +0200 >>>>> >>>>>> This avoids messages like this after suspend: >>>>>> >>>>>> cdc_ncm 2-1.4:1.6: no reset_resume for driver cdc_ncm? >>>>>> cdc_ncm 2-1.4:1.7: no reset_resume for driver cdc_ncm? >>>>>> cdc_ncm 2-1.4:1.6: usb0: unregister 'cdc_ncm' usb-0000:00:1d.0-1.4, CDC NCM >>>>>> >>>>>> This is important for the Ericsson F5521gw GSM/UMTS modem. >>>>>> Otherwise modemmanager looses the fact that the cdc_ncm and cdc_acm devices >>>>>> belong together. >>>>>> >>>>>> The cdc_ether module does the same. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks. >>>> >>>> It seems to be part of 3.0-rc2, but I'm not seeing it in any stable tree >>>> yet... >>>> >>>> When can I expect it in stable trees like 2.6.38.y? >>> >>> The .38.y tree is closed and will not have new releases, so you will >>> never see it there, sorry. >> >> Ok, are there chances for .39.y? > > There are, it requires the patch to be in Linus's tree first, It's already there: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=85e3c65fa3a1d0542c181510a950a2be7733ff29 > please see Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt for the details. Thanks for the pointer. It seems I've missed the Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> line(s). Would this be the correct syntax in order to get it into 2.6.38.x and 2.6.39.x? (2.6.38 wasn't closed at the time I submitted the patch) Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> # .38.x Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> # .39.x Should I resubmit the patch, or can you just cherry pick 85e3c65fa3a1d0542c181510a950a2be7733ff29 from Linus's tree? metze
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
