On 05/12/11 13:49, Premi, Sanjeev wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of >> Munegowda, Keshava >> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 7:35 PM >> To: linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: Munegowda, Keshava; Balbi, Felipe; Gadiyar, Anand; >> parthab@xxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [PATCH 3/5] arm: omap: usb: device name change for >> the clk names of usbhs > [snip]...[snip] > >> --- a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c >> +++ b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c >> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ >> #include <linux/gpio.h> >> #include <plat/usb.h> >> >> -#define USBHS_DRIVER_NAME "usbhs-omap" >> +#define USBHS_DRIVER_NAME "usbhs_omap" >> #define OMAP_EHCI_DEVICE "ehci-omap" >> #define OMAP_OHCI_DEVICE "ohci-omap3" > > [sp] Shouldn't we be consistent in using minus/dash and > underscore in the device names? Also, can't we avoid once again changing the clock names (at least for a while...)? Is that really necessary? Can't hwmod use current clock names? Because, Linus is sooo happy each time he sees that kind of changes.... -- Regards, Igor. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
