Re: [PATCH] EHCI : introduce a common ehci_setup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 09:56:38PM +0200, matthieu castet wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Le Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:30:57 -0700,
> Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> 
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 01:32:32PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:08:10PM +0200, matthieu castet wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > This allow to clean duplicated code in most of SOC driver.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matthieu CASTET <castet.matthieu@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/usb/host/ehci-atmel.c     |   20 +-------------------
> > > > drivers/usb/host/ehci-cns3xxx.c   |   10 +---------
> > > > drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.c       |   21 ++-------------------
> > > > drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c       |   29
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/usb/host/ehci-ixp4xx.c
> > > > |    7 +------ drivers/usb/host/ehci-msm.c       |   20
> > > > +------------------- drivers/usb/host/ehci-mxc.c       |   17
> > > > +---------------- drivers/usb/host/ehci-orion.c     |   14
> > > > +------------- drivers/usb/host/ehci-ppc-of.c    |   19
> > > > +------------------ drivers/usb/host/ehci-ps3.c       |   19
> > > > +------------------ drivers/usb/host/ehci-sh.c        |   16
> > > > +--------------- drivers/usb/host/ehci-spear.c     |   10
> > > > +--------- drivers/usb/host/ehci-xilinx-of.c |   15
> > > > +-------------- 13 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 175
> > > > deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Very nice.  And I'm guessing you tested this out on some of these
> > > other SOC devices?
> > 
> > Ok, as you didn't respond, I'm guessing not, so I'm dropping it from
> > my patch queue.  Please resend when you test it.
> Sorry for the late reply.
> 
> I checked it was correctly building for some of them, but I don't have
> the hardware to test.

You don't have the hardware for any to test at least one?

> Most of them is : remove the duplicated code and call the generic code
> (that is same code that removed one).
> 
> How do you want to proceed with this patch ?
> I submit the generic code. And let's each soc driver maintainer test
> and submit a patch for their soc ?

Yes.  It looks like you subtly change some of the logic in some of these
boards which might not be good.

> Or all the patch is applied and potential regression will be catch
> by SOC users ? 

I'd prefer not to do that.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux