On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:00:09PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 18 March 2011, Andy Green wrote: > > What's the plan for leveraging that level of generality on "dynamically > > probed devices"? I mean I know what I want to use this for and the > > platform_data scheme covers all the soldered-on-the-board cases fine. > Isn't there also a device tree based OMAP tree that can boot on > Panda and is just waiting to get merged? Did the stuff with multiple interrupt controllers get resolved? That's pretty important for practical use. There have been quite a few iterations of the device tree patches for ARM over the last release but the iterations I looked at all seemed to be bugfix type stuff. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
