On 03/13/2011 12:53 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
This _really_ should just use the device tree stuff, that is what it is
for, please don't duplicate it here in a not-as-flexible way.
I agree.
@Andy: If it doesn't work for you for some reason, please let us know the
usage case that is not covered (in detail).
The device tree stuff does not yet exist in a workable way,
platform_data is established everywhere except USB bus. Device tree
brings in bootloader version as a dependency: this method doesn't.
It is not the same device tree we are talking about. :-)
I mean device hierarchy (and I guess Greg meant the same).
I see. Elsewhere on the previous thread people were proposing to use
New Shiny Device Tree, hence the confusion.
I am using the old style device tree to walk the device's parent path.
What were you guys actually suggesting to do differently via the device
tree then that's cleaner?
-Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
