On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:50:39PM +0000, Andy Green wrote: > This is part of an RFC patch series introducing asynchronous platform > data, which may be attached to discovered bus devices at probe time > based on the device path. > > As part of the series, platform_data is enabled in usbnet layer. > > This patch defines the usbnet platform data, allowing the panda board > definition file to assert the naming of the usbnet network interface > should be eth%d instead of usb%d. Why is this? If you want to do this, it should be done in userspace today, no need to involve the kernel in this type of thing. So I don't see the point of this patch. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
