On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 01:36:25PM -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:52:08AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:42:18AM -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:52:51PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 02:11:50PM -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > > > > The irq enabling code is going to be refactored into a new function, so > > > > > clean up some checkpatch errors before moving it. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Looks good to me. > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > Your reviewed-by email (dtor@xxxxxxx) is different from the email you > > > sent this message from (dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx). Which is correct? > > > > > > > Both? People use multiple e-mail addresses... You will also see > > dtor@xxxxxxxxxx address used by me as well. Just pick the tag as is if > > you decide to bother with addng it to the changelog, otherwise feel free > > to ignore it. > > > > I guess I should finally fully migrate to gmail, bt then dtor@xxxxxxx is > > much faster to type ;P > > Ok, no worries. It's just that we're very careful to make sure that the > Signed-off-by email addresses match the actual email of the sender. > It's a contract according to Documentation/SubmittingPatches (see #12), > and we want to make sure the email address is correct. I don't think a > Reviewed-by tag is as big deal as a Signed-off-by tag, but I just > thought I'd check which email to use. :) Hm, is it Intel's internal policy? Because as far as I know DCO requires using one's real name and simply a reachable e-mail address; at least most of my patches are signed off using dtor@xxxxxxx but sent from (or committed as) gmail.com address. Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
