On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:18:24PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 24-02-2011 5:31, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > >+ if (ep_ring->first_seg == ep_ring->first_seg->next&& > >+ state->new_deq_ptr < dev->eps[ep_index].stopped_trb) > >+ state->new_cycle_state ^= 0x1; > > The last line seems overindented. Hi Sergei, checkpatch.pl doesn't complain about it. It is not a good use of my time to respin this patch for one stylistic change that is not a violation of the Kernel community norms. I really feel strongly that you are wasting the community's time by commenting on style when it is only a violation of your personal style, without providing any useful feedback on the code itself. I feel so strongly that I'm seriously considering setting up a feedback bot for you. It would run any patch you reply to through checkpatch.pl, and send you a small reminder when the patch passes, but you complained about style. I think it would allow you to have a sense of how frustrating it is to receive these unnecessary stylistic comments. Sarah Sharp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
