Re: [BUG] usb_set_device_state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 02:15:04AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> I got following message during booting mmotm-02-04.
>>
>> sky2 0000:04:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
>> sky2 0000:04:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
>> sky2 0000:04:00.0: Yukon-2 EC Ultra chip revision 2
>> sky2 0000:04:00.0: irq 44 for MSI/MSI-X
>> sky2 0000:04:00.0: eth0: addr 00:1a:4d:65:01:51
>> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:278
>> in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 21, name: khubd
>> 3 locks held by khubd/21:
>> Â#0: Â(&__lockdep_no_validate__){+.+.+.}, at: [<c047e2dd>] hub_thread+0xcd/0xf10
>> Â#1: Â(&__lockdep_no_validate__){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0419a82>] device_attach+0x22/0x90
>> Â#2: Â(device_state_lock){......}, at: [<c047c4c4>] usb_set_device_state+0x24/0xf0
>> irq event stamp: 6264
>> hardirqs last Âenabled at (6263): [<c05d7adf>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xaf/0x140
>> hardirqs last disabled at (6264): [<c05d9196>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x26/0x70
>> softirqs last Âenabled at (6252): [<c015d137>] del_timer_sync+0x57/0xa0
>> softirqs last disabled at (6250): [<c015d0f4>] del_timer_sync+0x14/0xa0
>> Pid: 21, comm: khubd Not tainted 2.6.38-rc3-mm1+ #1
>> Call Trace:
>> Â[<c015d0f4>] ? del_timer_sync+0x14/0xa0
>> Â[<c013cc29>] ? __might_sleep+0xe9/0x120
>> Â[<c05d80f6>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x26/0x50
>> Â[<c038272f>] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x3f/0x140
>> Â[<c0289b98>] ? sysfs_get_dirent+0x28/0x70
>> Â[<c028b3f1>] ? sysfs_merge_group+0x21/0xc0
>> Â[<c041dd75>] ? wakeup_sysfs_add+0x15/0x20
>> Â[<c041fdf5>] ? device_set_wakeup_capable+0x45/0x80
>> Â[<c047c578>] ? usb_set_device_state+0xd8/0xf0
>> Â[<c0484556>] ? usb_set_configuration+0x366/0x680
>> Â[<c028a381>] ? sysfs_do_create_link+0xb1/0x1e0
>> Â[<c048c93b>] ? generic_probe+0x3b/0x90
>> Â[<c028a4e7>] ? sysfs_create_link+0x17/0x20
>> Â[<c0485849>] ? usb_probe_device+0x29/0x50
>> Â[<c0419822>] ? driver_probe_device+0x82/0x190
>> Â[<c05d98a2>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x30
>> Â[<c0419a09>] ? __device_attach+0x49/0x60
>> Â[<c0418af3>] ? bus_for_each_drv+0x53/0x80
>> Â[<c0419ada>] ? device_attach+0x7a/0x90
>> Â[<c04199c0>] ? __device_attach+0x0/0x60
>> Â[<c0418915>] ? bus_probe_device+0x25/0x40
>> Â[<c04174c5>] ? device_add+0x5a5/0x670
>> Â[<c047c100>] ? usb_hub_init+0xa0/0xb0
>> Â[<c042182c>] ? pm_runtime_forbid+0x4c/0x60
>> Â[<c047dee0>] ? usb_new_device+0xe0/0x120
>> Â[<c018336b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10
>> Â[<c047e904>] ? hub_thread+0x6f4/0xf10
>> Â[<c016d7a0>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
>> Â[<c047e210>] ? hub_thread+0x0/0xf10
>> Â[<c016d384>] ? kthread+0x84/0x90
>> Â[<c016d300>] ? kthread+0x0/0x90
>> Â[<c0103606>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10
>> -
>>
>> It seems usb_set_device_state disable irq by spin_lock_irqsave.
>> But it calls device_set_wakeup_capable which ends up calling sysfs_merge_group.
>> It calls mutex_lock. :(
>>
>> Is it already known BUG?
>
> Not that I know of.
>
> Does this also happen in Linus's tree and/or in linux-next?

I didn't test it but maybe it's related to https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/1/14/440.
It is in linux-next and mmotm, not Linus tree.

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>



-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux