On Tue, Jan 25 2011, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 14:45 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:10:45AM -0800, Daniel Walker wrote: >> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 18:06 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: >> > > On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:49:43PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: >> > > > With cmwq, there's no reason to use separate workqueues. Drop >> > > > msmfb_info->resume_workqueue and use system_wq instead. >> > > > >> > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > > > Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@xxxxx> >> > > I'm not the right person, CC according to MAINTAINERS >> > >> > ARM/QUALCOMM MSM MACHINE SUPPORT >> > M: David Brown <davidb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > M: Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > M: Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Oops, sorry about that. So how does the patch look? Are you gonna >> take it through msm tree or shall I take it? > > David ? > > Daniel Is it difficult for you to test this change, Daniel? I can pull it in once we verify it still works. Thanks, David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
