Re: the proper value of timeout of usb_control_msg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hi:

2011/1/2 Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sat, 1 Jan 2011, vichy wrote:
>
>> after tracing the source code, I found usb_hcd_giveback_urb will be
>> called in ehci_urb_done when interrupt happen and that is the normal
>> path.
>
> Yes.
>
>> But what makes me confuse is when timeout happen such as
>> wait_for_completion_timeout in usb_start_wait_urb, which function will
>> call usb_hcd_giveback_urb and bring -2 to it originally I guess maybe
>> the ehci_watchdog, but I think it is not, because the function has no
>> idea of the time out parameter, right?
>
> No, not ehci_watchdog.  It's the same function as above, ehci_urb_done.
>
>> BTW, under what circumstance the status of urb will be -150?
>> I grep include/linux and didn't find amy error number which is -150.
>> appreciate your kind help :)
>
> include/linux is not the right directory.  You should be looking in
> arch/*/include/asm and include/asm-generic/errno*.h.  If you are using
> an x86 architecture then the URB status should never be -150.  But if
> you are using a MIPS architecture then -150 is the same as
> -EINPROGRESS.
>From your suggestion it seems the error number has levels, I mean from
xx to yy I can search in include/linux but from yy to zz, I have to
search from some where?
Would you mind telling me the rule?
appreciate your help,
vichy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux