Hi, On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 08:41:55PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
@@ -1150,29 +1204,7 @@ static int musb_gadget_queue(struct usb_ep *ep, struct usb_request *req, request->epnum = musb_ep->current_epnum; request->tx = musb_ep->is_in; - if (is_dma_capable() && musb_ep->dma) { - if (request->request.dma == DMA_ADDR_INVALID) { - request->request.dma = dma_map_single( - musb->controller, - request->request.buf, - request->request.length, - request->tx - ? DMA_TO_DEVICE - : DMA_FROM_DEVICE); - request->mapped = 1; - } else { - dma_sync_single_for_device(musb->controller, - request->request.dma, - request->request.length, - request->tx - ? DMA_TO_DEVICE - : DMA_FROM_DEVICE); - request->mapped = 0; - } - } else if (!req->buf) { - return -ENODATA;Hm, you say the patch is against the musb-hw branch, but the above two lines are long removed upstream. Well, I've double checked and the lines are present in that branch. So it seems there'll be a conflict here when merging this patch to Greg's tree...
I don't see this hunk there and I'm using Greg's usb-next branch which has my changes. -- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
