Hello. I wrote: [...]
This patch is against Greg's 'usb-next' branch where the aforementioned commit is now residing. If possible, it should be merged with that commit...
Do you prefer Felipe to queue this as another patch, or do prefer to fold it into the original.
As my tree is now based in git, I can't fold anything together, so I will need a follow-on patch. I only take musb patches from Felipe, so he will have to handle this and forward it on to me.
I'm picking it up and sending final pull request now. Just a few mins.
I wonder how you've managed to overlook that am35x.c and da8xx.c are broken in usb-next. Looks like you've silently fixed this in your patch2 where you've introduced the global usage of 'struct musb_platfrom_ops' (but without noting it in the changelog). I've noticed that too late yesterday to send the patch. What are we to do with it now? My opinion is that we should first fix this compilation issue, and then rebase the other patches.
Just sent you the fix for that issue. Took too long -- I'm having issues concentrating today. :-( Hopefully, it'll be useful. :-)
WBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
