Re: [PATCH 04/11] USB: musb: gadget: fix MUSB_TXMAXP and MUSB_RXMAXP configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2010/11/8 Bob Liu <lliubbo@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> Hi, Felipe
>>
>> After apply this patch, we will still get data corruption on blackfin
>> platform(g_zero test)
>> even following all of MingLei's suggestion.
>
> Maybe it is another problem, but I have asked you to post your
> log when the corruption issue happened, seems you did not provide
> anything, so how could you hope to get further help from community?
>

Hi, Ming

I think i have posted the information in my mail on Oct 22.
I described the error situation.
If more log is needed, please feel free asking me and which musb_debug
level is needed.

>>
>> As you said
>> "NAK. I have observed data corruption when using double buffering on
>> tusb6010, omap3430 and omap3630."
>> when cliff first upload patch "USB: musb: disable double buffering for
>> older RTL versions".
>> link:http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=126472940418964&w=2
>
> Anyway, this patch sent by cliff is wrong, I have explained it before,
> so it is certainly to be fixed. Without the patch, g_ether is broken and
> all full speed tests are broken. There are two guys who complained the
> broken g_ether caused by cliff's patch already, but fixed by my patch.
>
> Â Â Â Â http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=128894639005312&w=2
> Â Â Â Â http://marc.info/?t=128640815600002&r=1&w=2
>
>> So could you please confirm this issue?
>> This patch won't cause data corruption on tusb6010, omap3430 and
>> omap3630 any more?
>
> Both beagle B5, C4 and -xM are OK(f_storage/g_zero/g_ether) wrt. double
> buffer mode after applying my patch. ÂSo I suggest the patch [USB: musb:
> gadget: fix MUSB_TXMAXP and MUSB_RXMAXP configuration] should be
> merged into mainline first.
>
> For blackfin's data broken issue, we may dig into further if any log
> can be provided by ADI guys. Also the patch below
>
> Â Â Â Â Â http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=128750402903278&w=2
>
> is sure to be needed if bfin want to work well with double buffer mode.
> Have you tried the patch on bfin? Anyway, you should post your musb log
> when data corruption is triggered.
>

I have added that patch, and all i have also posted the diff result on
my platform in mail
date Oct 22.
you can see what patch i have applied for testing.

-- 
Thanks,
--Bob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux