RE: xhci isoc : Not enough bandwidth for altsetting 6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sarah Sharp [mailto:sarah.a.sharp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 10:21 PM
> To: Sander Eikelenboom
> Cc: Xu, Andiry; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: xhci isoc : Not enough bandwidth for altsetting 6
> 
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 11:18:56PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> > With the patch Andiry made i still get the bandwidth error.
> > [ 1255.993046] usb 9-3: Not enough bandwidth for new device state.
> > [ 1255.998969] usb 9-3: Not enough bandwidth for altsetting 6
> > [ 1256.005636] usb 9-3: Successful Endpoint Configure command
> 
> Your current output is different than the previous output:
> 
> > >>> [   35.280971] xhci_hcd 0000:02:00.0: In xhci_handle_event
> > >>> [   35.280976] xhci_hcd 0000:02:00.0: `MEM_WRITE_DWORD(3'b000,
> 64'hffffc90000378638, 64'h78a3e668, 4'hf);
> > >>> [   35.280982] xhci_hcd 0000:02:00.0: ERROR: unexpected command
> completion code 0x11.
> 
> That's a different error.  The messages you're getting now mean the
> hardware didn't have enough bandwidth for the camera, whereas before
it
> indicated there was an error with the input to the hardware.  So
> Andiry's patch does fix a bug.
> 
> Andiry, can you send a proper patch with an explanation and
> signed-off-by line?  Thanks!
> 

OK. I'll submit a patch to fix the MaxPacketSize mask bug. For CErr
field, as there are ambivalent descriptions for isoc endpoints in
current spec, I'll leave it intact by now.

Thanks,
Andiry 

 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux