Greg, Thanks for your suggestion! Our current problem is that we wish to enable Nokia composite gadget on our platform and do debugging and validation work as soon as possible. However, due to endipoint number limit, we have to remove ecm/eem function in order to enable this gadget. However, for now it's hard to modify hardware, and our distro kernel-maintainer has asked us to get Mainlain kernel accepted firstly. So is it possible that this patch can be accepted for the moment (what about add a module_param to ensure the change will not affect the original design)? Much of our work depend on it. And in the future there will be a specific composite gadget for our platform. At that time, we will not use nokia.c any more. Rgds, Jiebing -----Original Message----- From: linux-usb-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-usb-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg KH Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 10:00 PM To: Li, Jiebing Cc: David Brownell; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Yuan, Hang Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb gadget: modify the handling of function binding return value A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 05:05:19PM +0800, Li, Jiebing wrote: > Thanks for the indication. Since all the functions need to be treated as a whole, > we will figoure out another way to enable it on our platform. Um, what does this mean? You will create a different type of patch and send it to us, or do something different in hardware, or try to get your distro kernel-maintainer to accept this patch that has been rejected? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
