> > Instead of adding new tests, > would it be better to add a new parameter > > to the existing tests? My two cents: no. I'd rather have focussed tests. Having parameters at all was just a hack to let me access more tests through what started out as a very narrow bandwidth access method. And ISTR that the params were limited: size, count, little else (at first). In terms of test design, it's best not to overload stuff. That said, including alignment tests in some of the current code might be OK ... though it'd be more clear just to have separate (and properly commented) tests focussed on just this "is the controller driver being stupid/incorrect) issue. An advantage of merging an alignment test with some of the others would be that existing test scripts might not need modification to pick up that extra test/code coverage ... - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
