On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Martin Fuzzey wrote: > Add a set of new tests similar to the existing ones but using > transfer buffers at an "odd" address [ie offset of +1 from > the buffer obtained by kmalloc() or usb_alloc_coherent()] > > The new tests are: > #17 : bulk out (like #1) using kmalloc and DMA mapping by USB core. > #18 : bulk in (like #2) using kmalloc and DMA mapping by USB core. > #19 : bulk out (like #1) using usb_alloc_coherent() > #20 : bulk in (like #2) using usb_alloc_coherent() > #21 : control write (like #14) > #22 : isochonous out (like #15) > #23 : isochonous in (like #16) Instead of adding new tests, would it be better to add a new parameter to the existing tests? Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
