On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Thanks Matt and Phill for confirming the line that triggers the oops. As I
> > am not able to reproduce it myself, it's a bit tricky to track down what
> > went wrong.
> >
> > Could you please apply the patch below? It's printing the hid <-> hiddev
> > <-> usb_interface connections at various stages of probing and open.
> > Hopefully it'll reveal a little bit what goes wrong and where.
>
> Jiri:
>
> There's something very fishy going on here. Even more so than these
> bug reports suggest.
>
> The whole business about hiddev_driver in hiddev.c looks bogus. It
> doesn't get used for anything and it never binds to an interface.
> Which means that the usb_find_interface call in hiddev_open should
> never succeed. At the very least it would need to specify hid_driver
> instead of hiddev_driver.
Yeah. That has been introduced by Arnd while removing BKL, and was bogus.
It has been fixed by 8fe294caf8c868edd9046251824a0af91991bf43 ("HID: fix
hiddev's use of usb_find_interface"), which makes it use hid_driver
(hopefully) correctly.
But since that commit, we are getting NULL pointer dereferences on
intfdata->hiddev in hiddev_open(). Very likely, it's not fault of that
commit -- after Arnd's bd25f4dd6972755579d0ea50d1a5ace2e9b00d1a and before
Guillaume's 8fe294caf8c868edd9046251824a0af91991bf43 we were not hitting
that codepath at all in fact.
> I have no idea what's really happening. Can you figure it out?
I am trying, but on my testing systems everything is behaving correctly,
so it's a bit more difficult. Ideas welcome.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
