On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:02:48AM -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote: > Thanks Greg for the quick response. > > I can see Sarah xHCI tree and Matthew's UAS tree but the last commits > date 8/9 and 8/1 respectively. It seems Sarah's xHCI tree would end up > the official xHCI implementation, but I was wondering about Matthew's > UAS tree? Why not merge it into Sarah's? Why would they, they are two different developers working on different things. > I'd like to use a UAS device, and it seems I'll have to merge the more > updated xHCI tree into the older UAS tree into a local branch. That's > not a problem. Are most people using Matthew's UAS tree for UAS > devices? Is there a consensus on UAS implementation? Just use the kernel.org tree to get the latest xhci code, it should now be all merged, right? And no, there is no consensus on UAS implementations yet, someone needs to post their driver for inclusion before that will happen. good luck, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
