On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:48:44AM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:41:49AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:31:50AM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:25:40AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:19:36AM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 04:49:11PM +0800, Andiry Xu wrote: > > > > > > >From 08d56cd6a34dff12bc753c6b5022a277ec03ee0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > > > > From: Andiry Xu <andiry.xu@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:33:27 +0800 > > > > > > Subject: [PATCH 01/10] xHCI: handle_tx_event() refactor: finish_td > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch moves the td universal processing part in handle_tx_event() > > > > > > into a separate function finish_td(). > > > > > > > > > > > > if finish_td() returns 1, it indicates the urb can be given back. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andiry Xu <andiry.xu@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > The patchset (with the updated patch #8) passes my testing. Thanks > > > > > Andiry! > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Um, you are going to have to resend all of these, with your > > > > "signed-off-by" to me, as I don't have them in my queue anymore. > > > > > > Do you want me to resend it or Andiry? It might be easier for me, as I > > > can rebase the patches against Dong's MSI patch. > > > > You can/should as you are the one adding your signed-off-by: to the > > patches :) > > Ok, what's the easiest way to make this apply cleanly for you? Should I > base against 2.6.35-rc5, add any xHCI patches from your queue[1], and > then rebase the patches? Yes, that would be best. Or you can base against linux-next which should be the same thing. Whichever is easier for you. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
