Hello, On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 5:13 PM Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 01:02:12AM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > > Re-send of previous set, with corrected patches. > > Hm, what tree are these going through? Do you need me to take them > through the linux-usb tree? Or are they going through a > platform-specific one somewhere? > > confused, Looks that Ben is busy and has no time to answer... I'm interested in merging these patches too. These patches were intended to be merged to 2.6.35-rc5. They are available on git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux for-2635-rc5/hsotg branch. IMHO these patches should go though the linux-usb tree - they don't touch any platform specific code, and register definitions (arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-usb-hsotg.h) in fact belongs to the driver rather than the platform. s3c-hsotg driver belongs to the linux-usb tree. Here is original message for that patch series - see http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-usb/2010/6/11/6261985 -->8--- Some further fixes for the s3c-hsotg block, as well as a repost of the missed USB phy clock setting patch which either got missed or passed over from last time. As a note, this series has a patch adding support for dedicated FIFO mode, this is in my view a fix, as when the hsotg block is compiled with dedicated fifos then each USB IN non-periodic pipe needs to be alloacted a unique TX FIFO. We have no actual data on how well the block performs when all IN TX NP FIFOs are all set to the same one, but it really should be fixed. I am not sure if I have been subscribed to linux-usb, please CC: me just in case. -- Ben --->8--- Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski Samsung Poland R&D Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
