On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That doesn't sound right at all. Are you sure you haven't confused > "ejecting" a device and "removing" a device? These are two distinct > actions. I am 100% not sure that I haven't confused those two terms. So when Windows 'stops' a device, it sends a suspend request, and the only comparable action under Linux for a mass storage device is to pull the plug? Whereas ejecting in Linux just unmounts the partition? That would explain quite a bit. > Yes it is. The usb_gadget_driver structure has suspend and resume > callbacks, which the device controller driver should invoke. If this > doesn't happen, it's a bug in the controller driver. And once again I find my foot in my mouth. This seem to be happening, which might be all I need. > See the fsg_suspend() and fsg_resume() routines in file_storage.c. At > the moment they don't do much, but you can always change them. > > Alan Stern Thanks for the help, Patrick Gitchell -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
