Re: Report ID problem with HID-RAW interface usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi ,


Thanx for the reply .

The below discussions clears the ambiguity regarding   <report id > usage  .

I hope some patch regarding the same bug fix will be there for hidraw
interface .

Thanx & regards
Amit Nagal



On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Alan Ott <alan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I thought I'd be able to just go check the HID specification and be able to
>> say that the report number is not sent as part of the payload for Set_Report
>> devices, since it would be redundant because the Report ID is sent over in
>> the wValue field.
>>
>> Unfortunately, I was not able to see that clearly laid out in the HID
>> specification in the section on Set_Report. I did however find language
>> saying "if a Report ID tag was used in the Report descriptor, all reports
>> include a single byte ID prefix," in section 8.1, Report Types.
>>
>> I did some tests with the Windows implementation, and indeed, when numbered
>> reports are used in the HID descriptor, the Windows implementation will send
>> the report ID as the first byte of the payload.>>
>> Based on the language in the HID spec, and the behavior of Windows, I
>> believe the buf+1, count-1 to be a bug.
>>
>
> Yes I think it is a bug.
>
> And the HID specification states:
> "If a Report ID tag was used in the Report descriptor, all reports
> include a single byte ID prefix. If the Report ID tag was not used, all
> values are returned in a single report and a prefix ID is not included
> in that report."
>
> My understanding is like the following and testing confirms it.
> 1) when HID device has explicit report IDs, then the report IDs will
> be transmitted on the bus.
> 2) when the HID device does not use report ID at all (implicit report ID 0),
> then this report ID 0 is not transmitted on the bus
>
> Reference:
> http://www.microchip.com/forums/tm.aspx?m=494711
> http://libusb.6.n5.nabble.com/Missing-first-byte-when-reading-HID-Feature-Reports-with-ID-td9460.html
> (we spent quite some efforts to get the libusb-1.0 Windows native
> HID backend to deal with report ID correctly).
>
> --
> Xiaofan http://sourceforge.net/projects/libusb-win32/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux