> Date: Friday, June 18, 2010, 6:59 AM > On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:04:44 +0200, > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > There is no gadget driver in the tree that > > actually implements the ioctl operation, so > > obviously it is not necessary to hold the > > BKL around the call. The original gadgetfs code used it as a passthrough to controller-specific ops, as I recall. Not much used, right. And yes, I suspect someone just threw some BKL stuff here without actually analysing whether it was necessary. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
