On Thursday 24 June 2010, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Dienstag, 22. Juni 2010, 15:43:24 schrieb Ondrej Zary: > > On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > This is a violation of the spec. Can you give me the IDs so that I can > > > put the devices into the quirks file? Or can I take this from the > > > driver? Do all devices that marked as always needing an irq transfer > > > behave this way? > > > > This is not a bug surprise as this device is broken in many ways. It > > takes ages to detect and identify and looks like cdc_acm. The > > pseudo-multitouch capable protocol is pretty bad too. Also there are some > > reports about devices using the same ID but different protocol. > > > > I have only one - 1870:0001, don't know anything about the other. > > OK, it seems like those devices are hopeless. Could you test this series > form harmlessness on a broken device and functionality on a non-broken > device? Tested with: 0eef:0001 D-WAV Scientific Co., Ltd eGalax TouchScreen 595a:0001 IRTOUCHSYSTEMS Co. Ltd. Touchscreen 1870:0001 Nexio Co., Ltd iNexio Touchscreen controller The patches have no visible effect on these devices so they're probably OK. -- Ondrej Zary -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
