Hi Greg, I believe the merge problem occurred with the commit: dee5658b482e9e2ac7d6205dc876fc11d4008138 Originally I submitted a patch and then they asked me to order the IDs and resubmit, so did I. But unfortunately in the end somehow both patches were merged. [PATCH] USB: serial: ftdi: add CONTEC vendor and product id [PATCH resubmit] USB: serial: ftdi: add CONTEC vendor and product id Was I supposed to do the resubmit patch in a way that would unpatch the first patch? Or is the word resubmit enough to know that this is the good patch? Thanks! Dani On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:30:02PM +0900, Daniel Sangorrin wrote: >> This patch corrects a problem with the merge of a previous >> patch to add the CONTEC identifier. > > What patch had the merge problem? Did I just end up duplicating stuff > incorrectly? What was the git commit id? > > thanks, > > greg k-h > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
