On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 02:11:53PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> >From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> >BKL was not really needed, just came from earlier push downs.
>
> >The only part that's a bit dodgy is the lseek function. Would
> >need another lock or atomic access to fpos on 32bit?
> >Better to have a libfs lseek
>
> >Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> [...]
>
> >diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/uhci-debug.c b/drivers/usb/host/uhci-debug.c
> >index 98cf0b2..b0cf4f8 100644
> >--- a/drivers/usb/host/uhci-debug.c
> >+++ b/drivers/usb/host/uhci-debug.c
>
> [...]
>
> >@@ -539,11 +534,11 @@ static loff_t uhci_debug_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t off, int whence)
> > new = file->f_pos + off;
> > break;
> > }
> >+
> >+ /* XXX: Can size shrink? */
> > if (new < 0 || new > up->size) {
> >- unlock_kernel();
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
>
> Should have dropped {}...
I've fixed that up in the version that got applied.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
